Skip to main content

Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')

CVE-2026-45311

Severity Low
Score 0/10

Summary

The `run_tests` tool executes `cargo test` in the workspace with `ApprovalRequirement::Auto`, meaning it runs without any user approval prompt. The source code explicitly states this design choice: fn approval_requirement(&self) -> ApprovalRequirement { // Tests are encouraged, so avoid gating them behind approval. ApprovalRequirement::Auto } cargo test compiles and executes arbitrary code: test binaries, `build.rs` build scripts, and proc macros. While auto-approving test execution is a deliberate design choice, it creates an inconsistency in the security boundary. However, in a malicious repository, test code can execute arbitrary shell commands, exfiltrate credentials, or establish persistence with zero approval. The attack is amplified by AGENTS.md (auto-loaded into the system prompt), which can instruct the model to run tests proactively at session start. This issue affects eepseek-tui and deepseek-tui-cli versions 0.3.0 prior to 0.8.23.

  • LOW
  • NETWORK
  • HIGH
  • CHANGED
  • REQUIRED
  • NONE
  • HIGH
  • HIGH

CWE-94 - Code Injection

Code injection is a type of vulnerability that allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code. This vulnerability fully compromises the machine and can cause a wide variety of security issues, such as unauthorized access to sensitive information, manipulation of data, denial of service attacks etc. Code injection is different from command injection in the fact that it is limited by the functionality of the injected language (e.g. PHP), as opposed to command injection, which leverages existing code to execute commands, usually within the context of a shell.

Advisory Timeline

  • Published